£22m
214-bed PBSA development, senior at 65% of cost with interest rolled to practical completion and a nomination agreement in place.
Issue — delivery required before the academic year.
What we fund
Development and investment across student, care and healthcare property.
Purpose-built student accommodation development
PBSA investment acquisition and refinance
Care home acquisition, single asset and portfolio
Ground-up care and specialist supported living development
Healthcare premises including primary care and clinics
Conversion of hotels or offices to student or care use
Refinance of an operator portfolio onto a single facility
Capex for registration compliance and room upgrades
Structures
These are trading businesses inside buildings. The structure separates the property from the operation where it needs to.
60–70% of total cost with interest rolled to practical completion, drawn against monitoring surveyor certificates.
Sized on net operating income with cover tested at a stressed rate, term of three to five years, on stabilised trading assets.
Property held separately from the operating entity on an arm's-length lease, which widens the lender list and can improve leverage.
Committed funding for room upgrades, compliance works and registration requirements drawn against certified works.
Underwriting
Operator quality is the first question, not the third.
Track record, financial strength and, for care, the current CQC or equivalent rating. A rating below good restricts the lender list sharply and can stop a transaction outright.
For PBSA, nomination agreements and the local supply pipeline. For care, occupancy by funding source — private fee, local authority, NHS — since the mix determines income durability.
Earnings before rent and management are tested against debt service and rent together. Where opco and propco are split, credit checks the lease is affordable to the operator, not just to the lender.
Track record
£22m
214-bed PBSA development, senior at 65% of cost with interest rolled to practical completion and a nomination agreement in place.
Issue — delivery required before the academic year.
£13.6m
Acquisition of two care homes with 118 beds, opco/propco structure and a £1.2m compliance capex tranche.
Issue — one home rated requires improvement at exchange.
General locations, clients unnamed. Completed facility sizes, illustrative only — not an indication of terms available to you.
Questions
General information on how these facilities are structured and placed. Not advice, and not an indication of terms.
Significantly. A rating of good or outstanding keeps the full lender list available; requires improvement narrows it and usually means lower leverage and a capex condition attached to drawdown.
Yes, though leverage is lower. A nomination agreement with a university materially improves both terms and the lender list.
The property is held in one entity and the operating business in another on an arm's-length lease. It widens the lender universe, since property lenders can advance against the propco without underwriting the trading business directly.
Yes, where consent and registration route are in place. The facility is sized on cost with a capex tranche and assessed against the post-conversion investment value.
Enquire
Beds, operator, tenure and cost or price is enough for a first view.
Direct line
+44 (0)20 [ 0000 0000 ]